Thursday, February 24, 2011

Why Corn?



A couple of days ago I had the opportunity to visit with a very pleasant woman with a very interesting job. She's involved in community wellness and was particularly interested in trying to promote healthier eating in our schools.  As readers of this blog know, it is an interest of mine as well. Jamie's Food Revolution (His Not Mine). But as we visited it quickly became apparent that as farmers we need to do a better job explaining to people why we grow what we grow.  What often seems obvious to us is decidedly not so to much of our consumer public.

In our conversation she was eager to understand why farmers like me weren't working hard to grow fresh veggies and fruit for the dietary needs of our local schoolchildren.  There IS (thankfully!) a movement afoot to get healthier, fresher, less-processed food into our schools and she obviously felt a perfect storm existed where our local farmers could shift their production to such food and supply a great local market.  In her mind it was a WIN-WIN.

If only it were that simple.

And there lies the rub.  I think many good-intentioned consumers mistakenly think it is that simple.  They want to eat fresh, eat organic, eat locally-grown.  Oh, and don't forget -- they want to eat affordably too!  And make sure everyone else in the world has plenty of food they can buy and eat too.

This is why farmers need to speak up.  We need to explain ourselves.  We need to explain to consumers that there needs to be efficiencies in production.  There are real differences between the soils, climate, infrastructure, markets etc. that allow certain foods to be produced in certain geographies.  There are important reasons I grow corn and not cauliflower in Northern Illinois.  Likewise a California cauliflower producer probably shouldn't be growing corn either. Our short growing season, our temperatures, our soils, or insect and disease profiles, etc. do not favor growing fresh market fruits and veggies.  Sure we could grow some for a short period of time during the summer.  But what do we eat the rest of the year?  And what do we do about the fact that because of my climate, soils, insects, diseases etc. I can only grow half as much cauliflower as that farmer in California?  At the same time, the farmer in California can't efficiently grow corn.  He might only get half the crop I can get and doesn't have the natural rainfall nor infrastructure to handle the huge volume of commodities produced.

Sure, I'm over-simplifying here.  Global food production is immensely complex.  But over time markets have a way to naturally adapt to create efficiencies.  I grow corn here because there are few places in the world where someone else could grow as much, as cheaply, and as able to transport it around the world to those who need it.  Bucking those natural efficiencies can be done.  I can grow cauliflower.  I can supply fruits and veggies to my local farmer's market.  I can even grow organically.

But there is a cost to our global society in doing so.

The next time you see a hungry child in Africa or a food riot in the Middle East, pause for a moment and think about the organic cauliflower you bought at your local farmer's market.

Was it worth it?

6 comments:

  1. I'm embarrassed to say it, but I'd never thought of it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great explanation. It reminds me of an article I ran across recently that addresses the same topic: http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2011/LuskNorwoodlocavore.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am very interested in this particular issue.

    I get it - but only to some degree. What I don't get is why we had local vegetables in our supermarket as recently as 10 years ago. Certainly there are some plants that are more cost-effective than others - but Illinois does grow pumpkins and tomatoes for commercial uses (canning) - why not retail?

    As for global uses - USAID, WPF and UNICEF are the three main buyers of Corn-soy blend; all three offer it as humanitarian aid (free or cheap to the end-users.) While it is efficient and cheap to grow, it has been implicated in malnutrition (see Doctors Without Borders presentation starvedforattention.org .)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for your comment Michelle and I'm glad you're so interested in the issue. I wish more people thought about it.

    I don't profess to the know the details of your particular local issue, but best guess is that 10 years ago economics favored local veggies for a small-subset of farmers in your local economy. Today, corn prices have quadrupled (due mostly to feed needs to satisfy demand for meat protein diets in the developing world and to a lesser degree biofuels.) Vegetable prices have not kept pace. Those few local farmers producing veggies have probably shifted production to corn/soy to meet increased consumer demand. As far as the pumpkins/tomatoes -- two things: 1.) Some of those products do make it to the local fresh market. 2.) As a percentage of total volume though, the local fresh market pales in comparison to the much wider and higher volume international market for canned produce.

    As for food aid, I am not a human nutritionist and am honestly over my skis. One thing I would ask though -- Is there a viable alternative to the corn-soy blend? Is it affordable? Shelf stable? Readily available?

    It may not alleviate malnutrition. But in certain circumstances it may alleviate mortality. And that's probably better than nothing.

    Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the reply...yes, I agree that it's a larger economic issue - but I am curious what specific economic changes happened 10 years ago; I'm seeing them across the grocery store as the quality of fresh food and meats decrease (farmer's market foods seem to be about the same, although more expensive of course.)

    If you look at the MSF video, you will note that they discuss a food known as Plumpy'nut, made primarily from peanuts and dairy, which meets all your criterion - and also does not require clean water or cooking, unlike CSB.

    CSB for foreign aid is the result of a political arrangement: USAID requires our aid to be in the form of US-grown food, and it sends - as you mention - the cheapest and most abundant foods we grow.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great post! It reminds me of a absentee landlord of my parents. She lived in California, we farm in southwestern Kansas. A couple of years ago, she called stating she'd read an article about soy biodiesel. She wanted her land planted to soybeans and the crop taken to a biodiesel plant because she had read of great returns to the farmers from these facilities. My parents had to explain, with information from the local extension office, the nearest biodiesel plant was 8+ hours away not to mention the fact the 10 year average for soybeans in our county was less than 20 bushels an acre. She still found it hard believe we could make her a better return on her investment (not to mention take better care of her land) with milo or wheat versus soybeans. She reluctantly let them continue with their current rotation. This took several months and they just about lost the land because the lady didn't understand why we could grow somethings but not others. We definetly need to better educate our consumers!

    ReplyDelete